Mr. Topaze (1961)


Bil’s rating (out of 5): BBB.5

Alternate Title: I Like Money

, 1961. . Screenplay by , based on the play by . Cinematography by . Produced by Pierre Rouve. Music by . Production Design by . Costume Design by , . Film Editing by .

Peter Sellers adapts the play by Marcel Pagnol after versions made in Hollywood and France, starring and for the first and only time directing as well.  He plays a mild-mannered teacher who can only understand his work through his sense of integrity, and when local aristocrat comes and demands that he pass her academically underperforming nephew in his class, he refuses.  He is summarily fired by the school’s headmaster , saved from penury by a friend whose nephew was also his student, a music hall performer (played by ) who introduces him to her city councilor boyfriend (future Pink Panther co-star ).  Lom is looking to hire someone to run a company he is setting up, which Sellers doesn’t know is a front for his own shady manipulating of tax dollars for his personal profit.  Sellers plays the unwitting fall guy for a good amount of time until reality comes knocking on his door and he awakens to the situation he is in; when he does, he finds he has a knack for the kind of corruption that has been played on him and, in a very literary ironic twist, beats his mischievous friends at their own game.  Pagnol’s world-weary cynicism isn’t in the least bit subtle, the honest man is punished and the corrupt one succeeds, but the charm of his characters prevents it feeling like a civics lesson and Sellers, adapting it beautifully to the English language, casts all roles with expertise.  He himself gives a touching, surprisingly subtle performance as a man whose devastating coming-of-moral-age is subtly expressed in the breaking of his optimistic gaze, and he surrounds his brittle performance with a vibrant cast of actors who paint bright colours around him.  The plotting is uneven, the first act feels more sluggish than the rest and the film takes a while to get into gear, but none of its flaws justify the poor reception that greeted it when originally released.  Sellers, who was always volatile about any kind of feedback, removed the film from circulation and it has rarely seen the light of day since, thankfully available again via a restoration project by the British Film Institute.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s