Leo Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina

B

(out of 5)


Relentlessly boring adaptation of Leo Tolstoy’s classic weepie has giving a two-dimensional performance as the classic heroine who throws all her privilege over for love with a sexy soldier. Married to codgery old , Marceau finds solace and renewed passion in the arms of military man , and much to the chagrin of royal Russian society, openly has an affair with him followed by plans to abandon her husband. Trouble is, she and her legal spouse have a child together, and her cuckolded husband will stop at nothing to use the child against her. Things get seriously depressing and take their bloody time doing it, but the least director Bernard Rose could do would be to make it more emotionally involving. As it is, the characters all come off as wimps, and even the period art direction and costume design look as if they’ve been borrowed from a better movie. On top of this, Rose has added a ridiculous subplot involving Tolstoy himself and his new involvement in the story (I mean beyond the fact that he actually wrote it), a plotline that is completely incongruous and at times confusing.


Icon Entertainment International, Icon Productions, Studio Trite, Warner Bros.

USA, 1997

Directed by

Screenplay by Bernard Rose, based on the novel by

Cinematography by

Produced by

Music by ,

Production Design by

Costume Design by

Film Editing by

Advertisements

One thought on “Leo Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s